Pedagogy for Media Assets—3
Media assets and learning objects for online courses include activities built on common web site capabilities. RSS feeds can supply a steady stream of relevant current content. A search bar can permit students to search the online course content or go outside to the World Wide Web. A calendar can show due dates, test dates, and other course benchmarks. Internal and external links can lead to articles or readings, a glossary, and other reference materials or course aids or supplements. Polls can work as information surveys or as pretest and posttest assessments.
A course on personal finance, for example, could begin with students responding to a poll on their current financial thinking and habits. Do they have a budget, for example, do they have a savings account, do they have a mortgage, do they carry credit card debt, are they risk averse, do they participate in an employee benefit plan, how old will they be when they retire, etc., etc.? This type of questionnaire serves a number of functions. The respondent begins to focus on key topics and anticipates learning more about them. The exercise activates their prior knowledge, confirms personal relevance and usefulness, and arouses motivation to learn. For the instructor, the poll may provide insight into the learners' levels of knowledge and mindsets about the subject, which may guide instruction. The poll may also be constructed as a test, self-administered before and after the course as a general assessment of learning.
Other built-in capabilities adaptable to online instruction are message boards, discussion lists, and email. The ability of learners to communicate with each other as well as with teachers or mentors is a critical component of effective learning. Learners become engaged through interaction, and interaction may be even greater and more inclusive in online environments than in physical classrooms.
Dialoguing in message strings, attending chat rooms, blogging, or teleconferencing, students can discuss course topics, ask and answer questions, debate issues, and develop collaborative projects. The most inclusive form of online interaction is the wiki, in which instructor and students generate, contribute, and edit course content. The types of communication or interpersonal interaction made available in an online course are limited only by the software and technologies employed.
Open source software has made sophisticated means of communication widely available at low cost. A web site developer could develop a site for an online course in Drupal, for example, or Joomla, Wordpress, or other free software. Depending on the level of technological commitment, an online "course" could be as simple as a blogsite with comments or a series of podcasts (basically slideshows with voice) or webcasts (basically online broadcasts of events), or as complex as an intranet site or academic portal with comprehensive hyperlinked text and multimedia. Like Facebook or MySpace or Linked In, a course can even create its own social network--the ultimate enhancement, perhaps, of the classroom as a learning environment.
The initiation and response patterns that communication technologies introduce also permit the development of test item files with answers, scoring, and answer feedback. Student assessment and course evaluation are key components of any instruction. Thus, just as pedagogy can be added to articles and media assets, pedagogy can be added or incorporated into the very capabilities that are built into software programs for developing web sites.
Labels: academic portal, distance learning, e-learning, e-textbooks, media assets, online courses, online textbooks, open source software, pedagogy, wiki-textbooks
Wiki Textbooks 5
The more research on wikis I do online, the more convinced I am about fundamental fallacies in the use of wiki-textbooks for content area learning. There is the question of standards of accuracy and veracity--editors can be anonymous or use fake names; one assistant professor even has his students VOTE on whether or not to accept edited content in their wiki textbook--and there is the question of the professoriate's role--the same assistant professor actually celebrates exchanging his role and status as an expert with that of gatekeeper! He has students write everything from the course syllabus to the exam questions (Heather Havenstein, Computerworld, 8/15/07, Wiki becomes textbook in Boston College classroom; Stan Gibson, 11/20/06, Using a Wiki: A Textbook Case: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2061136,00.asp).
Even experts in IT, possibly the most relevant field for application, debunk wikis as just another form of groupware, prone to fall into disuse as burdens of information management displace knowledge creation (Steven J. Vaughan Nichols, 5/22/06, Wikis Are a Waste of Time: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1965848,00.asp). Not to mention the potential for vandalism, e.g., the pre-calculus wiki-text containing ads for Viagra, Cialis, Levitra, Propecia, Phenteramine, and auto insurance (http://pc40s.jot.com/WikiHome).
But I also see that this is not an all or nothing thing. There IS a place for wikis: providing contexts for skill development. By creating wiki-texts students can develop search skills (how and where to find out all you need to know), thinking skills (how to evaluate what you find and where you find it), judgment skills (how to choose what to include and exclude and what to believe as true), and organizational skills (how to structure and interrelate information from diverse sources). In this use, which is certainly very important, specific content areas are not needed; any topic will do--even, for example, umlauts in the names of heavy metal bands (http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/gems/umlaut.html).
Thus, I think I would have a wiki-text project as a course supplement cum cooperative learning activity rather than as the primary vehicle for transmitting course content. If I were a modern history professor, for example, I might have students write one chapter on "between the wars" to show contributing causes of WWII. In this instance the wiki-text is restricted in scope and integrated around a particular (albeit complex) question and serves a particular instructional goal. I have to wonder, though, if I would have the time to manage the project.
On practicality, a high school history teacher (Clay Burell, 4/12/07 http://beyond-school.org/2007/04/12/update-on-the-broken-world-wiki-history-textbook-project/) had the following to say: "The wiki textbook project has not been difficult to manage at all, so far (but at the same time, it’s not a very student-centered project–the only choice students got was to choose which chapter of WWI to WWII history to turn into a textbook chapter). All students have drafted their re-write of the textbook chapter (paraphrasing skills, reading comprehension, writing), added multimedia (using del.icio.us searches, rss searches, etc–research skills), made a presentation (normally Powerpoint, but that’s fine, and they’re improving impressively at that, possibly because their slideshows are published for real audiences on the wiki), then given, with their partners, lectures to the class using their Powerpoints (speaking skills). I film the lectures, capture them in iMovie immediately after, and upload them to Google Video daily.
To keep the other students learning from these student-taught classes (rather than zoning out), they are quizzed each class on the content from the prior class’ lectures. (And yes, I do some post-mortem teacher lecturing after each student lecture to clarify points and model the “presentation as storytelling” approach I’m pushing them to learn. That is filmed and posted on the wiki too, which has interesting applications for semester exam reviews, next year’s classes, and general uses for world audiences as well.)
Finally, students self-assess their embedded lectures with a rubric my English dept colleagues made, and write goals for improvement for their follow-up lecture. They post these metacognitive skills-reflections on the discussion tab of their wiki page.
They’ll do the whole process again in a “Cold War” wiki textbook, and be graded for their lectures that time as an oral test grade (this first round is just a quiz grade for the lectures).
So the wiki textbook project is really traditional in terms of content, but offers a legacy product for future students with multimedia offerings a paper textbook obviously can’t offer.
Above all, my objectives for this project (like all my projects, really) are about literacy: reading, writing, speaking, listening, researching.
And collaborating."
Collaborating can be forced, however. I recently discovered a wiki tutorial on how to write a textbook. It has glaringly uneven topical development with many unpopulated sections. It was created by an IT prof. in the UK and guess whom he cites extensively on the subject of textbook authorship: ME! Thank you, but now I have to think about editing that wiki to accurately reflect what I actually say in my books and completely cover the topic!!! Maybe I should ask him if he would like to coauthor a book (a real one) with me.
Labels: custom publishing, custom textbooks, online textbooks, wiki-textbooks, Wikis
